Significance of the colour blue in Poor Miss Finch

 

Poor Miss Finch is a domestic story written by Wilkie Collins, published in London in 1872. The novel is sensational and adapts a distinctive style of storytelling, with love triangles, disability, secrets, identity deception, cure of disabilities (blindness in this novel), marriage, etc. The novel brings the transformation of identities even in the character's colour, i.e, blue colour.

 

The protagonist of the novel is a young lady named Lucilla Finch who is in her early twenties. She lost her eyesight in childhood, as a toddler. Collins brings a burning question to the readers regarding her disability of sight whether she can marry? However, one of the abilities of Lucilla's disability is to recognize colours by just touching, further loathing dark colours which will bring a change in the plot. Lucilla's hatred for all the dark colours will bring difficulties in the lives of the characters in the novel.

 

The narrative portrays the romantic relationship of Lucilla Finch with an intelligent and soft-spoken guy named Oscar Dubourg. The cause of Miss Finch's blindness is an operation for removal of her cataract, but it ruie her vision and she became blindness. When she was engaged to her Fiance, Oscar, she became a prey of facing identity issues when Oscar's twin brother Nugent arrives and competes for Lucilla's affections. In her blind state, Lucilla started hating dark colours, it can be symbolic of her blindness (darkness) which is hated. The situation became problematic when Oscar fell ill of epilepsy and he started receiving its treatment containing silver nitrate which stained his skin a dark blue colour (a colour that Lucilla hated). It was due to a skin discoloration called agryria. Oscar refers to Lucilla's this queerness as her 'strongest antipathy', that is, a purely imaginary antipathy to dark people and dark shades of colours of all kinds." Because of the silver nitrate treatment and getting the dark blue colour, Oscar was afraid that Lucilla would reject him if she saw his skin colour. His secrets get darker than his dark skin which will set the problems, difficulties and confusion in all the character's lives in the text.

 

The central struggle of the novel begins when Oscar takes help from Lucilla's friend and companion Madame Pratolungo. The motive of her help was just to hide his dark blue skin colour from Lucilla as she was scared of dark colours. However, the love becomes a triangle with the entry of Oscar's twin brother, Nugent. Nugent was identical to Oscar in everything  including his tone of voice but what differentiate him is moral character. Oscar had inner goodness in his dark blue coloured skin while Nugent had inner evilness and self-motives in his white skin. The evil twin schemes to take away Lucilla by eloping her impersonating his good brother, Oscar. Due to Lucilla's fear of dark colour, Oscar tells her that his twin brother is blue, referred to by his neighbours and not him.

 

The colour blue has a significance in the novel. It further highlights the aim of the story: whether a blind should marry a blue person? That's impossible because no person has blue skin, it's a strategy of Collins to revolve the colour theory in the 19th century adapting technological change. Moreover, Wilkie Collins could use the character of Oscar and his blue skin to focus on the irrelevant relationship of race and colour in the world. Collins also used Lucilla's blindness portraying the reaction of the world towards colours. Colour has cultural significance in society among race, sexuality and gender which was prevalent too in the Victorian period. Although Oscar's colour transformation seems sensational, it is grounded in the Victorian time of medical practices. Till the mid-nineteenth century, the physicians continued to prescribe the silver nitrates to treat certain ailments, whether it's blindness, gonorrhoea, epilepsy, etc even after knowing its side effects in skin discoloration as seen in Oscar's life.

 

To cure Lucilla's blindness and marry her, Nugent arranges two German surgeons which helps Lucilla to gain vision though gradually. This is the situation when confusion arrives as she finds out that Nugent is white and it's Oscar who is prey of skin discoloration and has dark blue skin. Nugent impersonates Oscar and convinces Lucilla to marry. But Lucilla realised that she no longer loved Oscar (Nugent impersonating as Oscar). At the end of the novel, Lucilla again loses her vision and becomes blind but she is apprised of Nugent's plot and Oscar's fatal condition, agreeing to the marriage as planned. Conclusively, it was clear that the medical surgery didn't treat Lucilla Finch but it deteriorated her life's inner peace, happiness and thrusted her in danger to marry the wrong man. It was her blindness which allowed a happy domestic situation full of romance. The blueness in the novel signifies, 'otherness'.

 

 

 

Familial structures in Jane Austen’s Persuasion

    Persuasion is a novel of manners written by Jane Austen in the year 1816 and published in 1818. Austen's novel revolves around a family in a small setting, either it's Pride and Prejudice, or Persuasion. The protagonist is known in her novels, however an absence of an antagonist appears.

 

     Anne Elliot is the protagonist of the novel Persuasion and the daughter of Sir Walter Elliot. She is a gentle, sensible and middle daughter in the Elliot family. As the novel processes, the only resistance in Anne's life is societal expectations comprising her family and friends.

 

     It is a novel of extended mourning and renewed hope. The dead mother has an impact in the novel. The story begins with the living father, Sir Walter Elliot- the baronetage- then shifts to Lady Elliot, suggesting the mother's role, the character and the implications of her death. Described as an autumnal novel, it gives a sense of season change, that is, awareness of change.

 

     The exceptional character in Persuasion is Anne who has a strong attachment to her mother (to the memories of her dead mother). She is gentle and kind to marry but even this gentleness can't get her an adequate life partner. The only reason is class rigidity and social status. Austen fails to address the differences in siblings in her novels.

 

     However, Austen gives a brief about the difference between siblings. The difference between a sibling is monitored based on the position in the family, gentleness, resemblance to the mother rather than her father, etc. In the current theory of family structure, siblings differ according to the principle of divergence by Darwin. In simple words, siblings find their niche within the family which makes them different. This is the same with Anne.

 

     Anne Elliot is the only family member who cares for everyone in anything. She is helpful and affectionate as her father is self-indulgent and cold. The relation between Sir Walter Elliot's narcissism and Anne's responsiveness is incorporated in their attitude which is contrary to personal appearance.

 

     Instead of becoming a revolutionary, Austen defends the traditional structure of respect and family values. But she is supportive of better social mobility of members of a family. Austen's portrayal of family reflects the phenomena of social reform that happened in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. Authors gave special efforts in writing about the value of family life rather than individual happiness. It is not limited to children to respect their parents but for parents too in raising their children, with an ultimate aim of growth of society as a whole.

 

     One of the continuous themes in the novel is the presence of silly parents. Parents are the head of the family, however, Sir Walter is self-involved and his ignorance can be seen which breaks the family. He couldn't make good decisions for the family. His insensible extravagance brings a conflict that leads Elliots to leave the home and he fails to guide his daughters. His selfishness could be seen in Elizabeth and Mary who believe in self-importance like their father. Anne is different from the qualities of her dead mother. She looks after other things than focusing on herself.

 

     John Locke theories regarding the parent's attitude toward children produced impactful changes in mindsets. Another important aspect is the marriage relationship which was required to be adhered to. The social status and class in marriage played a crucial role in the early eighteenth century. These fundamental changes in writing played a significant role in declining patriarchal family structure and gave birth to individuality and companionate marriages.

 

     This gradual change in family structure resulted in creating a more balanced relationship between husband-wife and parent-children. To better understand the family structure, one needs to compare the siblings in the same house.

 

     Anne in Persuasion suffers emotionally as she has no authority or power and most of the time, her usefulness is rejected. While Emma suffers morally as she has authority and is useless in real life. At the end of the Persuasion, Anne's sense of responsibility goes beyond the immediate domestic environment to a much wider community. At the end of the novel, there is a fulfilment of love that was awaited for a long, between Anne and Captain Wentworth. It became possible after her release from a family in which her usefulness, emotional and domestic support was wasted. After her mother's death, her practical abilities were frustrating and were of no use to others.

 

 

About the Character of Mak in The Second Shepherd's Play

 

The Second Shepherd's Play is a mystery text, contrasting spirituality and the materialistic world. Written at Wakefield at the end of the fifteenth century, it highlighted political, religious and economic differences.

 

     Through the play, the anonymous author shifted the essence of earthly life into Christianity, that is, morality. The poor shepherds' Coll, Gyb and Daw represent the socially backward class who were used by the wealthy landowners. They had to face harsh winters, wind, family issues, hunger, etc.

 

     The objective of the play was to bring out the role of charity on earth through the shepherds. However, the play wouldn't be successful without the role of Mak.

 

     Mak is the antagonist in the play who lived with his wife, Gill and several children. He was a thief and he stole one of the sheep from those Shepherds. With the character of Mak, selfishness, pride and deceitfulness have been shown in men.

 

     Mak knows that the act of stealing is a sin and a death punishment, yet he turns away from God to fulfil his self-serving will. In contrast, the three shepherds showed mercy on Mak when the act of stealing unfolded. The shepherds had faith in God and this led them to forgive Mak's sin, ultimately redeemed by Christ. Whereas, Mak lives with tumult throughout.

 

     The thief (Mak) represents the pride, selfishness and immortality that exist in humans. At night, The Shepherds asked Mak to sleep in between them, symbolically, pride and immortality were between them without their knowledge.

 

     As Coll, Gyb and Daw's economic status was somehow similar to Mak, the Biblical songs connected them between Earth and the spiritual world. They complain about their lives after the song (or hymns) ended, showing a break from the biblical world makes humans worry about their problems, lives, etc. In simple words, a connection with God (through songs in the play) removes all materialistic problems, but a slight pause may recollect the traumas and difficulties in earthly life.

 

     Mak was poor like the shepherds. He had no food to feed his family, therefore he started stealing and became a thief. There is a contrast that Mak could also do a job like shepherds to earn a living (as mentioned in the play that the landowners wanted more shepherds to work for them), but stealing shows an act of turning away from God and becoming a sinner.

 

     The theme of forgiveness runs in both subplots of the play. At first, The shepherds forgive Mak for stealing their sheep. The main reason for forgiveness was Mak's deteriorated condition of no food and money. The shepherds didn't give him the death penalty for stealing which is forgiveness and charity for well-being. This very act of forgiveness leads the shepherds to another plot in Bethlehem where they meet Christ.

 

     All of Shepherd's pain, complaints go away when they get to know about the birth of Christ in Bethlehem. They didn't even care about the harsh weather or the miles of distance to walk and in the end, they attain the heavenly bliss where they were forgiven by Christ. It showed how the earthly sufferings of the shepherds ended with the power of Christ's birth.

 

     Mak doesn't believe in God or his goodness but he is very well aware of others who believe in God. Therefore he uses his name to escape from danger or to show his loyalty.

 

     When the shepherds came to his cottage, he swore that he didn't take their sheep. Moreover, he uses God as a sign of goodness in his lies.

 

     Mak:

 

No sheep have I brought,

Neither heifer nor goat,

And Gill, my wife, rose not,

Here since she laid her.

As I am true and loyal, to God, here I pray

That this be the first meal I shall eat this day. (Scene - 5)

 

     Mak is a selfish character who uses ill tactics and fails to accept goodness to attain God in the nativity. Both Mak and the shepherds were aware of the punishment of stealing sheep (death punishment). The shepherds who were crumpled with landlords and had to live in cold weather never sinned. In contrast, Mak knew about his wrongdoings, yet he committed them. Further, he used God's name to escape the danger. In this play, it has been shown that the better we do will bring goodness though in this life or later.

 

     Mak failed to recognize the value of goodness, charity, Christian values and goodwill (forgiveness). The main theme of the play is redemption through charity and forgiveness which has brightened with the presence of Mak.

 

     First Mak was offered friendship by those shepherds which he rejected. When he was caught stealing, he was given forgiveness by the shepherds which is a kind of charity. Moreover, they don't give him death punishment but forgive him with humiliation. These acts of charity led to the redemption of shepherds with the blessings of the angel. Mak failed to get any such blessings because of his deceitfulness, pride and selfishness.

 

 

Works Cited

 

Introduction, Joseph Gonzalez, THE WAKEFIELD SECOND SHEPHERD’S PLAY.

https://earlybritishlit.pressbooks.com/chapter/the-wakefield-second-shepherds-play/. Accessed 27 March 2022.

 

“The Second Shepherds’ Play.” THE WAKEFIELD SECOND SHEPHERD'S PLAY, text.

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/mobile/folders/1OcyuEUtPXzkefzFbnntSOlMWXDFzr8HT/1QroWnOlJ8egDPELnJRC4euNNdAAnm1yB/1fBeiq3IWW4yLmPcmZlR5a2341EbQG-CG?sort=13&direction=a

 

Weeks, Rachel. “The Second Shepherd’s Play Themes.” LitCharts.

https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-second-shepherd-s-play/  Accessed 27 March

Significance of the colour blue in Poor Miss Finch

  Poor Miss Finch is a domestic story written by Wilkie Collins, published in London in 1872. The novel is sensational and adapts a distin...